简介：AbstractArtificial intelligence (AI) is now a trendy subject in clinical medicine and especially in gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. AI has the potential to improve the quality of GI endoscopy at all levels. It will compensate for humans’ errors and limited capabilities by bringing more accuracy, consistency, and higher speed, making endoscopic procedures more efficient and of higher quality. AI showed great results in diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy in all parts of the GI tract. More studies are still needed before the introduction of this new technology in our daily practice and clinical guidelines. Furthermore, ethical clearance and new legislations might be needed. In conclusion, the introduction of AI will be a big breakthrough in the field of GI endoscopy in the upcoming years. It has the potential to bring major improvements to GI endoscopy at all levels.

简介：AbstractBackground:Despite the recent large number of studies comparing endoscopic and laparoscopic resection for small gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) (diameter ≤5 cm), the results remain conflicting. The objective of this work was to perform a cumulative meta-analysis to assess the advantages and disadvantages of endoscopic resection vs. laparoscopic resection.Methods:The meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. We searched medical databases up to January 2020. Meta-analytical random or fixed effects models were used in pooled analyses. Meta-regression, cumulative meta-analyses, and sub-group analyses were performed to improve the accuracy of the conclusion. Sensitivity analyses were applied to assess the robustness of the results.Results:A total of 12 cohort studies with 1383 participants comparing endoscopic resection and laparoscopic resection were identified, while three cohort studies with 167 participants comparing endoscopic resection and laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery were found. We found that endoscopic resection had shorter operation times (weighted mean difference [WMD]= -27.1 min, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -40.8 to -13.4 min) and lengths of hospital stay (WMD = -1.43 days, 95% CI: -2.31 to -0.56 days) than did laparoscopic resection. The results were stable and reliable. There were no significant differences in terms of blood loss, hospitalization costs, incidence of complications or recurrence rates. For tumor sizes 2 to 5 cm, endoscopic resection increased the risk of positive margins (relative risk [RR] = 5.78, 95% CI: 1.31-25.46). Although operation times for endoscopic resection were shorter than those of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (WMD = -41.03 min, 95% CI: -59.53 to -22.54 min), there was a higher incidence of complications (RR = 4.03, 95% CI: 1.57-10.34).Conclusions:In general, endoscopic resection is an alternative method for gastric GISTs ≤5 cm. Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery may work well in combination. Further randomized controlled trials are recommended to validate or update these results.